There’s a persistent myth in the business world that self-managed organizations are chaotic.

“No bosses? Then who’s in charge?”
 “How do you hire or fire?”
 “What happens when someone doesn’t pull their weight?”

These are fair questions — but they often come from a deeply ingrained belief that accountability must be top-down. That without someone standing over you, things will fall apart. That structure equals order and hierarchy equals productivity.

But I’ve seen something radically different — something far more powerful: 

“True accountability thrives in the absence of forced hierarchy.”

Let me walk you through it.

When Power Is Centralized, Performance Can Hide

In a traditional hierarchy, a person’s performance can be subjective — colored by perception, personality, or proximity to the boss. I’ve watched individuals underperform for months, even years, simply because their manager liked them. It created a dangerous blind spot. While the rest of the team felt the burden, their feedback was filtered — or worse, dismissed. The “problem” remained insulated by politics.

Eventually, the truth would surface. Sometimes both the underperformer and their boss would be let go. But by then, the damage was already done — morale depleted, trust broken, and business results eroded.

Accountability wasn’t just delayed. It was distorted.

In Self-Management, You Can’t Hide

Now contrast that with a self-managed team — one where everyone is responsible for the work and for each other.

In this environment, no one hides. Because no one can.

“You don’t report up. You report to the team. Your work is visible. Every Single Day.”

This kind of transparency creates an incredible intimacy. You depend on each other. You know when someone is contributing — and when they’re not. If a teammate starts dropping the ball, it’s immediately felt across the group. Not because someone is checking your timesheet, but because the flow breaks. The rhythm stumbles. The whole team feels it.

That’s real-time accountability. Not performance reviews once a year. Not closed-door decisions. But open, honest dialogue based on shared experience and mutual reliance.

Who Does the Firing?

Here’s the part that really makes people uncomfortable:
 Yes, someone can be fired in a self-managed organization.
 But here’s the twist: anyone can initiate it — and the entire team decides.

If someone is no longer aligned or not pulling their weight, the team can “call a case.” This isn’t a witch hunt. It’s a structured, principled process — a moment for feedback, clarity, and course correction. If things improve, great. If they don’t, the team, by consensus, may decide to part ways.

That’s not chaos. That’s maturity.

In a hierarchy, one person can fire you. In a self-managed company, everyone can — but only through consensus.

You can’t play politics with ten peers. You can’t charm your way out of consequences when you’ve broken trust across a system built on mutual support.

The Myth of Control vs. the Power of Trust

Traditional models confuse control with effectiveness. But control breeds dependency. And dependency breeds disengagement. In contrast, self-managed systems assume that people want to do great work — and give them the autonomy, the clarity, and the tools to do it.

Take Morning Star, for example — one of the world’s largest tomato processors. They’ve operated without bosses for decades. Every team member signs peer-to-peer agreements about responsibilities. There’s no formal management. Yet they are remarkably effective.

Or look at W.L. Gore, the makers of GORE-TEX. Their self-managed teams have been delivering innovation for decades.

Even Zappos’ shift toward holacracy, while not perfect, reflects a growing realization: when people feel empowered and trusted, they rise.

And the data backs this up:

Self-managed teams are 15–20% more productive than traditional teams. Companies like RCAR Electronics saved $10 million a year by switching to self-managed structures. 74% of employees report being more effective when they feel heard — something baked into the DNA of self-management.(Source: Open University, Reclaim.ai, Forrest Advisors)

Self-Management Demands 100% Accountability

Here’s the truth: self-management only works if everyone shows up with full accountability. Not 60%, not 90% — 100%. It’s not for the faint of heart. It’s not for people looking to coast or pass the buck. It’s for people who own their contribution and respect the collective.

And it’s not leaderless. It’s leaderful. Everyone leads. Everyone listens. Everyone learns.

So if you’re building a team or transforming an organization and wondering whether self-management is too “loose” or “messy,” ask yourself:

Are you looking for control? Or are you ready to trust your people?

Because self-management isn’t a free-for-all. It’s a system built on purpose, trust, and radical accountability — where people are seen, heard, and counted on.

And when that happens, magic follows.

—

Want help implementing self-management and creating an accountable, purpose-driven culture? I’ve helped organizations transition to self-managed systems that work. Let’s talk.

Connect with me →